Legal Opinion · Dissent

Curtis Gene Hoyt v. Gutterz Bowl & Lounge L.L.C.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 2013No. 11–0085Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the dissenting judge on the court of appeals that summary judgment was correctly granted by the district court. Negligence cases in general and bar fights in particular are poor candidates for summary judgment. But, here, it is undisputed the bar owner kicked out the troublemaker. There was no reason to eject the well-behaved victim of the troublemaker’s verbal abuse or call the police before the quiet patron unexpectedly jumped the troublemaker in the parking lot. The evidence is insufficient to raise a jury question on negligence or scope of liability.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Factory Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Community School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. Troy McCormick and Lynn McCormick v. Nikkel & Associates, Inc. D/B/A NAI Electrical Contractors, a CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  4. Boone v. MartinezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Regan v. Denbar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API