Legal Opinion
In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 24, 1999No. Nos. M.D.L. No 1023, 94 Civ. 3996(RWS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, Senior District Judge.
Class plaintiffs have moved (1) pursuant to Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, to require class member John Genins (“Genins”) to post a bond to secure costs, including attorneys fees, arising from Genins’ proposed appeal, and (2) for sanctions against Genins pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 11 and 28 U.S.C. § 1927. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motions are granted.
The parties, facts and prior proceedings have been set forth more fully in several prior opinions of the Court, familiarity with which is assumed. See In re Nasdaq…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- In Re Anthony R. Martin-Trigona, Movant. In Re George Sassower, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Reverend Clovis Carl Green, JrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davey v. DolanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- In re General Electric Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Walker v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In re Pharmaceutical Industry Average Wholesale Price LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.