Legal Opinion

Kersh v. BORDEN CHEMICAL, a DIV. OF BORDEN, INC.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided June 14, 1988No. Civ. A. 82-CV-74444-DTPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JULIAN ABELE COOK, Jr., District Judge.

On May 12, 1988, Plaintiff, David A. Kersh, filed a “Motion To Quash Trial Date And To Disqualify This Court From Proceeding Any Further In This Case.” Defendants, Borden Chemical and Borden, Inc. (hereinafter called Borden), have responded in opposition. Although Kersh failed to file any brief in support of his motion, he filed a “Supplemental Brief in Support of Affidavit and Motion to Disqualify” on May 26, 1988. On the following day (May 27, 1988), Kersh filed an “Additional Brief in Support of Motion to Disqualify Trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. Evan Alexander ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  4. Burton S. Knapp v. John P. KinseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. United States v. Samuel E. StoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pope v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1990
  2. Robinson v. GregoryDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API