Legal Opinion

Dillon v. Bundy

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1991No. 90AP-82PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Faulkner, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying their motion for a new trial. Plaintiffs requested a new trial on the issue of damages for the reason that the jury verdict in their favor was inadequate.

Plaintiffs, Jo Mae Dillon and Roger W. Smith, were injured on May 10, 1985 when defendant, Fay E. Bundy, negligently operated her automobile into plaintiffs’ vehicle at the intersection of Sullivant and Davis Avenues. Defendant failed to stop at a flashing red stop signal, which signal was flashing yellow for plaintiffs. As a result of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Maggio v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Yungwirth v. McAvoyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Verbon v. PenneseOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Berge v. Columbus Community Cable AccessOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Bailey v. AllberryOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Torres v. Concrete Designs, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Roetenberger v. Christ HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API