Legal Opinion
Zito v. Kingsley
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 7, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
92 N.J. Super. 37 (1966)
222 A.2d 130
FRANK ZITO AND TANINA ZITO, TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH HACKENSACK IN THE COUNTY OF BERGEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, AND CHARLES S. PICARDI, LEONARD PERRELLI, SR., AND JOHN J. JANNUZZI, BOARD OF ASSESSORS OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH HACKENSACK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
WILLIAM KINGSLEY, ACTING DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF TAXATION, AND THE BERGEN COUNTY BOARD OF TAXATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 13, 1965.
Decided July 7, 1966.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.
Mr. Ralph W. Chandless…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Switz v. KingsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Thomas v. KingsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- EVERETT E. THOMAS, ETC. CO., INC. v. KingsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Little Egg Harbor Township v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New Jersey Tax Court · 1987
- City of Bayonne v. International Nickel Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- General Motors v. City of LindenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996