Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Kingsley
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered
Pee CuRIAm.
This case involves the validity of Chapter 141 of the Laws of 1964 (herein Chapter 141). The subject is ad valorem taxation of property. In 1960 the Legislature enacted Chapter 51 of that year (herein Chapter 51), but later postponed the effective date of the tax reforms it would accomplish. That act is now to go into operation in January 1965. Chapter 141 modifies Chapter 51 for 1965 and 1966, and it is this modification which plaintiffs assail. The trial court upheld Chapter 141 (85 N. J. Super. 357) and we granted plaintiffs’ petition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Jersey Restaurant Ass'n v. HoldermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Switz v. KingsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Village of Ridgefield Park v. Bergen County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- EVERETT E. THOMAS, ETC. CO., INC. v. KingsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. v. GlaserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Yellow Cab Co. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Sabato v. SabatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Ferrara v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Friedland v. PodhoretzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.