Legal Opinion

State v. Mendoza

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1969No. 1733PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, justice:

Defendant Espiridion Morales Mendoza, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was tried and convicted of unlawful possession of narcotic drug-—heroin—in violation of § 36-1002, A.R.S., with a prior conviction, and was sentenced to serve a term of not less than fifteen years nor more than sixteen years in the Arizona State Penitentiary. From the judgment and sentence of the court, he appeals.

Defendant was 52 years of age at the time of the trial, and had been addicted to the use of narcotics for approximately twenty-five years.

The first question presented by defendant was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DeMichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. United States v. Phillip MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. NordstromArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Griffin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API