Legal Opinion
Bigley v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 23, 1992No. 3-90-068-CRPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
CARROLL, Chief Justice.
The original opinion in the cause, dated January 8, 1992, is withdrawn and this opinion is substituted in its place.
A jury found Ervin Allen Bigley, Jr. guilty of possession of 400 grams or more of methamphetamine. See Texas Controlled Substance Act, 1983 Tex.Gen.Laws, ch. 425, § 9, at 2379 (Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4476-15, § 4.04, since repealed and codified at Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (Pamph.1992)). After finding Bigley was a repeat offender, the jury assessed punishment at ninety-nine years in the Texas Department of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Butler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Hollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Dusek v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Holder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hunt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.