Legal Opinion

United States v. Shakir

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 28, 2000No. 3:98-00038PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOHN T. NIXON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are three motions filed separately by defendants Eben Payne, Donnell Young, and Jamal Shakir. (Docs. No. 739, 865, 868.) The motions concern defendants’ requests for what they term “pre-authorization discovery,” namely, discovery which the defendants argue they need so that they can present mitigating evidence to the United States Attorney in accordance with the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) “Death Penalty Protocol.” The government has filed a Response in opposition to all motions. (Docs. No. 768, 905.)

Also pending is Defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States Ex Rel. Accardi v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DelatorreDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
  2. United States v. PerezDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
  3. United States v. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. United States v. PrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. United States v. HaynesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API