Legal Opinion

United States v. Pray

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 17, 2011No. 1:10-mj-00001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

Defendants Mark Pray, Kenneth Ben-bow, and Alonzo Marlow 1 have been indicted by a Grand Jury, along with co-defendants who are not parties to the instant motion to compel, on narcotics charges, murder charges in aid of racketeering, maintaining a continuing criminal enterprise, and operating a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO), in violation of federal and local criminal statutes. Because of the nature of the charges, each is potentially eligible for the death penalty and is facing the death…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. McVeighDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KhatallahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. United States v. BenbowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  3. United States v. NicholsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API