Legal Opinion

Sutton Ex Rel. Sutton v. Kaarakka

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 11, 1992No. 91-1557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, P.J.

Pursuant to sec. 102.29(1), Stats., of the Worker's Compensation Act, the trial court approved a medical malpractice settlement in favor of Jeanne M. Sutton. The court, however, reserved a portion of the settlement to guarantee payment of future worker's compensation obligations. Sutton, the employee, appeals the trial court's ruling that the interest earned by this reserved account is to be retained by the fund rather than paid directly over to her. We affirm the trial court's ruling.

This case makes its second appearance in the court of appeals. In Sutton v. Kaarakka, 159 Wis. 2d 83, 464…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hauboldt v. Union Carbide Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Lakin v. Daniel Marr & Son Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  4. Sutton Ex Rel. Sutton v. KaarakkaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Threshermens Mutual Insurance v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Preston v. Meriter Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. Threshermens Mutual Insurance v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API