Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Dolan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1972No. 10967-aPublished

1DissentWollman, Judge

It is clear that William H. Smith intended that the property be distributed to his children by right of representation if John H. Smith should die leaving no heirs of his body. This being the *433case, it seems to me that we do violence to the testator's intent if we reach a result that vests an interest in the property in one other than the blood line of William H. Smith. As the California court stated in the case of In re Rutan's Estate, 119 Cal.App.2d 592, 260 P.2d 111, 118:

"Moreover, as said in Re Estate of Boyd, 24 Cal.App.2d 287, 289-290, 74 P.2d 1049, at page 1050: 'It is well settled that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Francisco Presbyterian Orphanage & Farm v. HansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. In Re Estate of HartsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Lowry v. Common Council of City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Estate of RutanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API