Legal Opinion

Hill v. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 1931No. 6122PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORCROSS, District Judge.

This cause was tried in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii upon an agreed statement of facts in conformity with a procedure authorized by the laws of that territory. 31 Hawaii, 264. From a judgment to the effect that appellee was not liable to a tax on certain income, appeal is taken.

The question presented is the liability of appellee to pay a tax on her income for the year 1926, derived from stock dividends, interest on bank deposits and on federal, state, and municipal bonds, and from her undivided proportionate share of her deceased father’s estate held…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Farmers Loan & Trust Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Blodgett v. SilbermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Baldwin v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  2. Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  3. González Díaz v. DescartesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  4. Lord v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  5. Splane v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API