Legal Opinion
People v. Agnew
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1952No. Nov. 17, 1952PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
114 Cal.App.2d Supp. 841 (1952)
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
ROSEMARY AGNEW, Appellant.
California Court of Appeals.
Nov. 17, 1952.
Rosemary Agnew, in pro. per., for Appellant.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney (Los Angeles), Donald M. Redwine, Assistant City Attorney, and Philip E. Grey, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent. [114 Cal.App.2d Supp. 843]
BISHOP, J.
Because the defendant was brought to trial without the aid of counsel, although she repeatedly requested that counsel be afforded her, we are reversing the judgment sentencing her to imprisonment on each of two counts, and are reversing the order…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Uveges v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Wade v. MayoSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Agnew v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Credit Bureau, San Diego v. SmallenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pizzitola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Pizzitola v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1963