Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1980PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Since the jury could have found that the defendant’s méthod of operation resulted in this instance in the use of the force of the movement of the train upon the victim to overcome her resistance to the taking of her purse, there was sufficient evidence that his act constituted attempted robbery rather than simple larceny (Penal Law, § 160.00). Furthermore, there was evidence that the victim’s death was caused either "in the course of and in furtherance of’ the attempted robbery or of "immediate flight…

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. SeinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  2. People v. ChessmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Michael Farrington v. Daniel Senkowski, Superintendent, Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. People v. MiddletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. United States v. SteedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API