Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., Jr
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentSeitz, Chief Judge
I find myself unable to agree with the majority opinion, based on my understanding of Pennsylvania law. I read the majority opinion as holding that the allegations contained in the plaintiffs affidavit were insufficient, as a matter of law, to show the defendants’ amenability to suit in Pennsylvania. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) provides that the sufficiency of the affidavit is a matter of Pennsylvania law. Pennsylvania courts test the existence of minimum contacts sufficient for exercise of long-arm jurisdiction under the three-part test set out in Proctor & Schwartz v. Cleveland…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Koenig v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Baron & Co., Inc. v. Bank of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.