Legal Opinion · Dissent

Time Share Vacation Club v. Atlantic Resorts, Ltd. And Coastal Marketing Associates, Inc. And Schuman, Martin L., Jr

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 9, 1984No. 83-1576Published

1DissentSeitz, Chief Judge

I find myself unable to agree with the majority opinion, based on my understanding of Pennsylvania law. I read the majority opinion as holding that the allegations contained in the plaintiffs affidavit were insufficient, as a matter of law, to show the defendants’ amenability to suit in Pennsylvania. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) provides that the sufficiency of the affidavit is a matter of Pennsylvania law. Pennsylvania courts test the existence of minimum contacts sufficient for exercise of long-arm jurisdiction under the three-part test set out in Proctor & Schwartz v. Cleveland…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. v. Cleveland Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Koenig v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Baron & Co., Inc. v. Bank of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API