Legal Opinion
Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. Yeutter
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 13, 1994No. Civ. No. 4-90-31PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Defendants Lennes and Ulland seek a stay pending appeal of this Court’s February 11, 1994, Order, pursuant to Rule 62(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Fed.R.Civ.P.).1 Plaintiffs oppose a stay, or alternatively, request that any stay be conditioned on the defendants’ posting of a bond. Original and supplemental briefs have been submitted by both sides. Argument was heard on April 11, 1994. For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motion for a stay is conditionally granted.
I. Analysis
The February 11, 1994, Order directs the distribution of approximately…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minnesota Milk Producers Ass'n v. YeutterDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994