Sloman v. Board of Pharmacy Examiners
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SNELL, Justice.
The Iowa Board of Pharmacy Examiners appeals the decision of the district court to set aside professional discipline imposed by the board upon David W. Sloman. The district court concluded the statutes under which Sloman was disciplined were unconstitutionally vague and that there was not substantial evidence to support the board’s decision. We reverse.
Substantial evidence in the record supports the following findings of fact made by the board. Sloman is a licensed pharmacist, practicing as the sole proprietor of a Medicap Pharmacy in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. In June 1986, an audit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- State v. SchwarmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Empower Pharmacy v. Iowa Board of PharmacyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2023