Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Morris v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 16, 2003No. CR 02-662Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partAnnabelle Clinton Imber, Justice

While I agree with the majority that the circuit court erred in not giving an instruction on the lesser-included offense of second-degree murder, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the circuit court’s refusal to instruct on manslaughter. In my view, the majority’s analysis on the manslaughter instruction is fatally flawed. The majority improperly weighs evidence, fails to follow Arkansas law, and the opinion itself is internally inconsistent.

First, the majority accurately states the question before this court: “[W]as there evidence, however slight, that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Harmon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Harshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Britt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API