Legal Opinion

In re Joseph P. Palmisano, Esq.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 2, 2017No. 2017-219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1106 ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. On June 20, 2017, Disciplinary Counsel filed notice with this Court that respondent Joseph P. Palmisano had been disciplined in the State of Arizona. In a written order, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge in Arizona accepted an agreement between Arizona Bar Counsel and respondent for discipline by consent. Accordingly, the Arizona judge suspended respondent for six months beginning August 1, 2017. Following this suspension, and beginning on the date of his reinstatement, respondent will be on probation in Arizona for two years.

¶ 2. On June 22, 2017, this Court directed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. In re William J. McCarty, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re HongistoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  5. In re O'MearaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Matthew Ragaller (Office of Disciplinary Counsel, Appellant)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  2. In Re Jessica Wilson (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2026
  3. In re William E. Conner, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API