Legal Opinion

Campaign for Quality Educ. v. State

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided April 20, 2016No. A134423; A134424PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

In these consolidated appeals, appellants ask us to reinstate their claims in which they seek declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that respondents are allegedly violating sections 1 and *8925 of article IX of the California Constitution.1 Appellants' claims are general in nature. They allege the constitutional sections provide for a judicially-enforceable right to an education of "some quality" for all public school children, and, alternatively, that the Legislature is currently violating its constitutional obligations to "provide for" and "keep up and support" the "system of common…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael Sato v. Orange Cty. Dept. of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. SHEA v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API