Hurley v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarroll, J.
The question in this case is whether the plaintiff and the intervenors, who were subcontractors in the erection of a school house called the Sarah Greenwood School, for the city of Boston, have filed a sworn statement of their claims under St. 1909, c. 514, § 22, within sixty days after the completion of the work. It was agreed that the Eagle Cornice and Skylight Works did not file its claim within the time required by the statute. The general contractor was the defendant Whiton and Haynes Company. The defendant National Surety Company gave a bond to the city of Boston upon the condition that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Palmer v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Hebert v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Benjamin Foster Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- DeBlois v. Boylston & Tremont Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- G. L. Rugo & Sons, Inc. v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Acmat Corp. v. DANIEL O'CONNELL'S SONS, INC.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.