Legal Opinion

Segal v. City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 3, 2006No. Docket No. 05-3211-CVPublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge.

Not every wrong committed at the hands of the government is cognizable as a constitutional violation. In this case, we harbor little doubt that the defendants-appellees committed certain errors during the course of an investigation that ultimately led to the plaintiff-appellant’s termination. Whether this constitutes a deprivation of liberty without due process of law, and is therefore cognizable in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, is a separate question.

The undisputed facts establish that the plaintiff-appellant, an at-will government employee, had…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. Segal v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. Okin v. Village of Cornwall-On-Hudson Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Houskins v. SheahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Hill v. Rayboy-BrauesteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  5. Anemone v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API