Legal Opinion

In re Kevin G.

New York City Family Court

Decided February 6, 1975PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNanette Dembitz, J.

The issue of law in the instant juvenile delinquency proceeding is the admissibility at trial of a report on heroin content of a seized substance, certified by a chemist of the police department’s crime laboratory, without the testimony iof such chemist. This question, which must be determined herein on the same basis as in a criminal prosecution, does not appear to have received a definitive answer in the courts of this State.1

*518The juvenile delinquency petition against the 15-year-old respondent herein charged that he “ handed ” a glassine envelope containing heroin to another juvenile; that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of ArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. Hoats, New York County Courts1980
  4. Matter of ArthurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. People v. D'Agostino, New York County Courts1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API