Legal Opinion · Dissent

Collins v. Frisbie

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 28, 1951No. 11269Published

1DissentMiller, Circuit Judge

■ I am of the opinion that the judgment of the District Court dismissing the application should be affirmed upon the following grounds:

It does not appear “that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State,” which under § 2254, Title 28, U.S.Code is a necessary condition precedent to the granting of the application in this preceeding. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761; Ex parte Hawk, 321 U.S. 114, 64 S.Ct. 448, 88 *469L.Ed. 572. The statement of the Court in Darr v. Burford, supra, 339 U.S. at page 219, 70 S.Ct. at page 598, that “Nothing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Ex Parte HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Woolsey v. BestSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Ex Parte SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API