Legal Opinion

People v. Rockwell

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 2005No. 02CA1812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

Defendant, Mark E. Rockwell, appeals the trial court order denying his Crim. P. 385(a) motion to correct his sentence to reflect that he is subject to a term of discretionary rather than mandatory parole. We vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.

Defendant was originally charged with single counts of second degree burglary of a dwelling, a class three felony under § 18-4-203(2)(a), C.R.S.2003, and third degree sexual assault. The charges resulted from a September 1998 incident in which defendant broke into a home and touched the victim's genitals while she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Martin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  4. People v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Wilson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Voller v. GertzColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. People v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  4. Voller v. GertzColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API