Legal Opinion
Smith v. City of Chicago Heights
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 13, 1992No. 90-2976PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
951 F.2d 834
King SMITH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO HEIGHTS, a body politic and municipal
corporation, Charles Ewers, individually and as agent of the
City of Chicago Heights and Robert Pinnow, individually and
as agent of the City of Chicago Heights, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-2976.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued April 2, 1991.
Decided Jan. 13, 1992.
Lawrence H. Hyman, Chicago, Ill. (argued), for plaintiff-appellant.
Charles E. Hervas, James G. Sotos, James R. Schirott, Michael W. Condon (argued), Patrick K. Bond, Phillip A. Luetkehans, A.J. Pankau,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Hollander, Jacque v. Brown, JamesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Robert Huber v. Gloria AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Benitez-Pons v. The CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Ernst & Young v. Matsumoto (In re United Insurance Management, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kremers v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.