Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. Outdoor Advertising Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 9, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Charles B. Wheeler,
Official Referee. This action is one to recover certain installments of rent claimed to be due and owing by reason of the fact the defendant held over and occupied certain premises after the expiration of the term specified in a written lease or license.
One Lucy Pomeroy owned certain premises located on the comer of Main and West Utica streets in the city of Buffalo.
On the 30th day of June,-1921, she entered into a certain agreement with the Thomas Cusack Company, by which she gave the Thomas Cusack Company “ the exclusive right and privilege to erect and maintain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reynolds v. . Van BeurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- G.L. P.J.R.R. Co. v. . N.Y. G.L.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- United Merchants Realty & Improvement Co. v. New York HippodromeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Hess v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Mehlman v. Atlantic Amusement Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Yachthaven Restaurant, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Richmond Children's Center, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987