Legal Opinion

Fosberg v. Tricam Industries Inc

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 10, 2021No. 4:20-cv-00126Unknown

1Opinion

PS TRICT COURT | NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ETE EPS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT) ¢¢p10 2021 | NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS | Ice need FORT WORTH DIVISION CLERE, 0.5, DISTRICT COURT KEVIN FOSBERG, § § Plaintiff, § Vs. § NO. 4:20-CV-126-A § TRICAM INDUSTRIES, INC., § Defendant. § MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Came on for consideration the motions of defendant, Tricam Industries, Inc., to exclude testimony of Mark Hood (“Hood”) and Philip Rosescu (“Rosescu”}). The court, having considered the motions, the responses of plaintiff, Kevin Fosberg, the replies, the record, and applicable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API