Legal Opinion

Slodov v. Stralka

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 16, 1991No. 61160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Journal Entry.

Sua sponte, the court denies the above-captioned writ for prohibition for failure to state a claim. The gravamen of Ike Slodov’s petition is that the respondents, Judge Kenneth R. Stralka and the Garfield Heights Municipal Court, do not have jurisdiction over a transfer of judgment and a judgment debtor until they serve the judgment debtor pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. For authority, Slodov relies upon Rules 4 and 69 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. This argument is not well taken.

R.C. 2329.02 controls proceedings for transfers of judgment. It provides in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Malone v. RevisOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Kline v. Ducato, Unpublished Decision (11-18-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Ohio Dept. of Taxation v. Apple Blossom Flowers, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API