Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1993No. 20157PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Chief Justice.
Charles Elijah Anderson appeals his convictions for the robbery and murder of Demecio Ulibarri. The major issue to be decided is whether SCRA 1986, 11-410 (rule of evidence regarding inadmissibility of offer to plead and statements made in connection with such offer) (“Rule 410”) makes inadmissible Anderson’s statement to a Texas law enforcement officer that he would confess to the New Mexico murder in exchange for the dropping of Texas burglary charges. Finding that the statement was not made in reliance on Rule 410, as a result of inducement by the state, nor…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Franklin Evon Sebetich A/K/A Frank, Earl Dean, Jr., A/K/A Dooney, Michael John BuhoveckyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- People v. FriedmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. McGruderNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. AguilarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. SMILENew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.