Brendle v. City of Houston, Miss.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIDSON, Chief Judge.
Before the court is the Municipal Defendants’ 1 Motion to Dismiss on the Basis of Statutory Limitations, Qualified Immunity, or Alternatively, for Summary Judgment. Upon due consideration of the motion, the court finds that the motion should be denied.
Factual Background The Plaintiff, William Brendle (Brendle), operated an auto repair business in the city of Houston, Mississippi. Brendle repossessed a vehicle from the grounds of an auto repair shop operated by the Defendant, Herbert Miller (Miller). On or about January 18, 1996, Miller, who claimed that he was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.