Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerome R. Weiner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1969No. 27734PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the ease on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 409 F.2d 804, Part I (5th Cir. 1969).

This case arises from a judgment of conviction on one count for violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1005, involving false entries in bank records. Appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years with confinement for a period of six…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Billy Joe Helton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Dodd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. Edenfield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Robert Michael Woosley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Edward Lee BeanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Lawrence Victor Miller, A/K/A Larry MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API