Legal Opinion

Oudin & Bergman Fire Clay Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Conlan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1904No. 4781PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered April 27, 1903, granting a temporary injunction against interference with, tbe affairs of a corporation.

1Per curiam

Respondent moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the controversy between the parties has ceased, as far as matters involved in this appeal are concerned. The suit was brought by the respondent corporation against the appellants to procure an injunction against appellants, preventing them from interfering with respondent’s business, from exercising, or assuming to exercise, any control over the affairs of the corporation, or authority over the workmen engaged at respondent’s place of business, and from selling, or offering to sell, any of the property of the corporation. It is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hice v. OrrWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chemical National Bank v. ColwellNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Sinclair v. DwightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Orr Water Ditch Co. v. Reno Water Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State Bank of Wilbur v. Wilbur Mission ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Weymouth v. OudinWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Oudin & Bergman Fire Clay Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ellern v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API