Legal Opinion
Duncan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 21, 2019No. 2:18-cv-01174Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAVEN DUNCAN, No. 2:18-cv-01174-KJM AC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Vv. ORDER 14 STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 15 | COMPANY, etal., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 In this insurance coverage case, plaintiff moves to remand on the basis that the 20 | amount in controversy does not meet the jurisdictional minimum. For the reasons below, the 21 | court DENIES the motion. 22 | I. LEGAL STANDARD 23 A motion to remand is the proper procedure to challenge a removal based on lack 24 | of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richard M. Sanchez v. Monumental Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Delores Lewis v. Verizon Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Gibson v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Bell v. Preferred Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.