Legal Opinion

Murray v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, J.:

The claimant in this case duly filed a notice of his intention to file a claim against the State for work done by him under a contract with the State, setting forth in the notice that the claim arose out of acts, faults and omissions of the State of New York, its officers, agents and servants, which acts, faults and omissions were specified as being the furnishing of plans and drawings of the work to be done under the contract, containing misstatements in respect to the amount of rock and earth to be excavated and the kind of earth *598which was to be excavated, all of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Buckles v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Konner v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Konner v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Schwartzberg v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
  2. A. W. Banko, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
  3. Epps v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Sacher v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  5. D'Angelo v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API