Legal Opinion

Tavernier v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 16, 1963No. Civ. No. 61-120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

On a jury trial, a verdict wTas returned in favor of defendant. During the course of the trial, the Court rejected an offer in evidence of the hospital record of the plaintiff in a Rapid City, South Dakota, hospital. The record included, among other things, a Roentgenological Report1 on a myelogram performed by a doctor in that city.

Plaintiff, on his motion for a new trial, argues that the Court erred in refusing to admit the record in evidence, and, in support of his position cites, among others, Medina v. Erickson, 226 F.2d 475 (9 Cir. 1955). These cases do not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KrugWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Medina v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Walton Manufacturing Company and Loganville Pants CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
  5. Michael J. Bertanzetti v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rood v. Umatilla CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API