Fraser v. City of Norwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1ConcurrenceO’Sullivan, J.
Although adopting a premise which seems to me to be untenable, my associates have reached a conclusion in which I concur. The premise upon which they rely is this: Where a city withholds a percentage of the money to which a police officer is entitled for services rendered and turns it over to a fund from which he may eventually draw benefits, his pay is the sum he receives after the deduction is made. Perhaps it may be stated more graphically in this fashion: While the plaintiff was employed by the city for, let us say, $200 a month, from which $4 *50was deducted monthly for the retirement fund,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Booth v. Town of WoodburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- State v. FylerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Keegan v. Town of ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Turney v. Town of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Kelly v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.