Legal Opinion
Cameranesi v. United States Department of Defense
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 2017No. 14-16432PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judgé WATFORD
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on September 30, 2016, and appearing at 839 F.3d 751, are'withdrawn. The superseding opinion and dissent will be filed concurrently with this order.
Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, filed November 14, 2016, is DENIED. Judge Ikuta voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Kle-infeld so recommended. Judge Watford voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. The petition for rehearing en banc was circulated to the judges of the court, and no judge requested a vote for en banc consideration. No further…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. U.S. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lahr v. National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Lane v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Andrew Grimm v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Transgender Law Center v. IceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Civil Beat Law Center v. Centers for Disease ControlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Jorge Rojas v. FaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Tuffly v. U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.