Legal Opinion

United States v. Heitner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 2, 1945No. 160PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

Heitner and Cryne appeal from a judgment of conviction for possessing and operating an unlawful still, and for conspiracy to do so. The chief witness was an accomplice, one Meierdiercks, who turned state’s evidence, and made out a case against them which if believed, left no doubt of their guilt. This testimony was in part corroborated by that of two policemen of New York City and by other witnesses whom we need not mention. The principal question raised by Heitner is of the sufficiency of the testimony to support a verdict; and we must confess ourselves unable to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API