D. B. Fisk & Co. v. McNeal
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. 1 Daniel Neg. Inst., Sec. 154. Fletcher v. Blodgett, 16 Vt., 26. Perry v. Bigelow, 128 Mass., 129. Costello v. Crowell, 127 Id., 293. Benedict v. Cowden, 49 N. Y., 396. Springfield Bank v. Merrick, 14 Mass., 322. Forméis Bank v. Frwing, 78 Ky., 266. Blake v. Coleman, 22Wis., 416. 1 Daniels •Neg.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. 1 Daniel Neg. Inst., Sec. 154. Fletcher v. Blodgett, 16 Vt., 26. Perry v. Bigelow, 128 Mass., 129. Costello v. Crowell, 127 Id., 293. Benedict v. Cowden, 49 N. Y., 396. Springfield Bank v. Merrick, 14 Mass., 322. Forméis Bank v. Frwing, 78 Ky., 266. Blake v. Coleman, 22Wis., 416. 1 Daniels •Neg. Inst., 153, 156. Riley v. Bickens, 19 111., 29. ICnoles v. Hill, 25 111., 288. Hollen v. Davis, 59 Iowa, 144.
1Opinion of the Court
Reese, Ch. J.
This action was for the purpose of recovering the amount due upon two promissory notes, each bearing date of July 1, 1878, and payable ten days after date. They ■were written upon similar printed blanks which we here copy:
“$......... ..................................187................................after date......promise to pay to the order of........................................................................................................................Dollars
at.......................................................................
Value received.
No..........…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Nylander v. NylanderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- In Re Estate of FeldmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Huth v. HuthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Eaton v. DelayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- E. E. Rivet & Sons v. DurandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.