Legal Opinion

Zurich Insur. Co. v. Friedlander

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 4, 1971No. [No. 337, September Term, 1970.] [No. 422, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

September Term, 1970.]

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

Jack L. Friedlander, an active practicing lawyer, a former active accountant, and an investor with a net worth of several million dollars, sued Zurich Insurance Company, which had issued to him and his wife a so-called Homeowners Policy that carried a “Credit Card and Depositors Forgery Coverage Endorsement,” under which the company agreed to indemnify the insureds up to $10,-000 for loss resulting from the forgery of a check or checks, claiming that during the period the policy was in force he had lost over $10,000 by virtue of checks drawn on his personal account which his private secretary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Cross v. LeuenbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Clausen v. DinnebeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  5. Bott v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blackstone v. SharmaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Springer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Kastendike v. Baltimore Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. McCloskey v. Republic InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API