Legal Opinion

Zitkov v. Zaleski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 5, 1925PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

Turning first to the errors assigned upon the trial court’s refusal to correct the finding, we find that the finding, so far as it states facts found as distinguished from conclusions, contains twenty-eight paragraphs, and of these the defendant moved to strike out twelve, which latter are those most concerned with the vital issues in the case. Defendant asks for the addition of ten paragraphs or parts of paragraphs. If the motion were granted in full, the result would be a nearly complete reproduction of the defendant’s draft-finding, and of course would not justify the conclusions of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Beacon Valley Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  2. Stone v. StevensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  3. Smith v. KingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  4. Shea v. BerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. DeLaurentis v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Vandersluis v. WeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Doroszka v. LavineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API