Legal Opinion
Richardson-Holness v. Alexander
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 19, 2015No. 1:13-cv-2761 (NG)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Leicha Richardson-Holness brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 against New York City Department of Education (“DOE”) administrators Michael A. Alexander, Ainsley Cumber-batch, and Antoinette Martin. Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) asserts claims of sex discrimination, hostile work environment, and conspiracy against all defendants. In addition, plaintiff asserts quid pro quo harassment and First Amendment retaliation claims against Alexander only. Defendants have moved to dismiss the First Amendment and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Malarczyk v. LovgrenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Sotak v. BertoniDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2020