Legal Opinion
Miyazawa v. City of Cincinnati
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 6, 1993No. C-1-92-311PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARL B. RUBIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon motions for cross summary Judgment (Docs. 15, 16, 17) and the replies thereto (Docs. 18, 19). The Court notes in passing that no person affected by the change in charter has filed any pleadings indicating opposition to such amendments.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The material facts are not at issue in this case. The Parties filed a Stipulation of Facts (Doc. 14) on Feb. 8, 1993.
At the general election held November 5, 1991, the electors of the City, of Cincinnati were given an opportunity to repeal Section 2 of Article IX of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Gerberding v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Thorsted v. GregoireDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1994
- Nevada Judges Ass'n v. LauNevada Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.