Contreras v. State

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

On original submission of this extradition case the appeal was dismissed Tex.Cr.App., *724581 S.W.2d 486 for failure of the record to reflect a final judgment and for lack of an appellate brief. Both deficiencies have now been properly corrected, so we reinstate the appeal.

In the Governor’s Warrant and many of the supporting papers the offense here is corruptly called fondling.1 Included in the packet is a reproduction of the particular statute delineating the offense, Mississippi Code Annotated section 97-5-23 (1972).2 It is akin to our own V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 21.10,…