Wray v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLINTON, Justice.
This is an extradition proceeding pursuant to applicable provisions of Article 51.13, V.A.C.C.P. The central contention appellant made below and reurges here is that he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the demanding state in he was not and has not been present in that state since the effective date of the legislative act denouncing as criminal the conduct he is alleged to have performed and, further, in that his conduct outside the demanding state did not cause the consequence the legislative act was designed to prevent or punish. We will hold the twofold…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fowler v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Ex Parte HarrisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Hardy v. BetzSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
- Contreras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte PotterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Ibarra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1997
- Castillo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Ex parte RhodesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Ex Parte PotterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.