State v. Elliott
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.
The defendant was charged and convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a girl under fifteen years of age. From an order granting a new trial, the state appeals.
The state’s evidence of the perpetration of the crime came from three witnesses: the prosecutrix, James Hayden, and Melvin Motland.
Some days subsequent to the verdict, Motland recanted the testimony he gave at the trial. In the order granting the motion for a new trial, the court recited:
“Notwithstanding the fact that a case sufficient to be taken to the jury was made out upon the testimony of [the prosecuting witness] and James…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. WynnWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Stickney v. CongdonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Henry v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Potts v. LaosWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. ShafferWashington Supreme Court · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.