Legal Opinion

State v. Elliott

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1940No. 28109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

The defendant was charged and convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a girl under fifteen years of age. From an order granting a new trial, the state appeals.

The state’s evidence of the perpetration of the crime came from three witnesses: the prosecutrix, James Hayden, and Melvin Motland.

Some days subsequent to the verdict, Motland recanted the testimony he gave at the trial. In the order granting the motion for a new trial, the court recited:

“Notwithstanding the fact that a case sufficient to be taken to the jury was made out upon the testimony of [the prosecuting witness] and James…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. State v. WynnWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Stickney v. CongdonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. SnyderWashington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Henry v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Potts v. LaosWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. ShafferWashington Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API