State v. Bruno
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The pivotal issue this appeal presents, is whether the requirement in State v. Wallace, supra, that appeals by the state shall be governed by the procedural requirements of App. R. 5 and the time requirement of App. R. 4(B), is retroactive or prospective only in application.
At the time of commencement of the appeal to the Court of Appeals on May 8,1975, this court had announced its decision in State v. Hughes, 41 Ohio St. 2d 208, on March 19,1975. The syllabus provides:
“Insofar as App. R. 4(B), permitting the prosecution, as of right, to appeal judgments of trial courts, enlarges the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MeekerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HughesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- City of Cincinnati v. McIntoshOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. MeltzerOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. FeltyOhio Court of Appeals · 1981