Terre Haute Gas Co. v. Teel
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Vigo Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
This was an action for the recovery of damages, resulting from an alleged nuisance, caused by the erection of the buildings and operating the works of said company, whereby the atmosphere was impregnated with deleterious and offensive odors, and the water with unpalatable tastes, &c.
Answer: 1. Denial. 2. The works are lawful and useful, authorized by the act of ineorporation, and properly conducted. 3. License by the city authorities. 4. That the works' are erected on grounds purchased of plaintiffs, they knowing-the purpose for which it was acquired', and are properly erected, and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Maffett v. PollardIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by13 opinions
- Judson v. L.A. Suburban Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Miles v. A. Arena & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Port v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Sherk v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.